www.bpsc.gov.bd 36th BCS Syllabus Download
 |
| www.bpsc.gov.bd 36th BCS Syllabus Download |
www.bpsc.gov.bd 36th BCS Syllabus Download.
DHAKA: Bangladesh Public Service Commission (BPSC)
on Tuesday published the syllabus of preliminary test of the 36th
Bangladesh Civil Service (BCS).
The syllabus was published on (www.bpsc.gov.bd) the PSC website.
According to the new amendment rules published on September 23, this
year preliminary examination will be taken on 200 marks which were 100
in previous years.
Unlike the previous years, this year examination time will be extended from one hour to 2 hours.
The application fee, which was Tk 500 in the previous year, has been fixed at Tk 700.
This year the candidates will fight against some 1,803 posts.
The preliminary exam will be held in the second half of December, 2015.
Details can be known from the link below:
http://www.bpsc.gov.bd/
Staff Correspondent : The written test result of the 34th Bangladesh Civil Service (BCS) examinations was published today.
A total of 9,822 candidates appeared successful in the written tests.
The result of the written tests is published at the website of the Bangladesh Public Service Commission (BPSC) website, a press release of the commission said.
Also, the result can be obtained by texting BCS34Registration number to 16222 from the state-run mobile operator Teletalk.
The results will not be published on the commission’s noticeboard.
Those appearing successful will now advance into the viva round, expected to begin from January 26, for qualifying for a government job – still among the largest employment sectors.
Earlier, a total of 12,033 aspirants qualified in the preliminary result of the 34th BCS published in July last year.
Jobseekers claimed that the prevailing quota system got in the way of many talented students. They went for agitation compelling the commission to reconsider the result.
On July 14 this year, a record number of 46,250 candidates passed in the reconsidered results. It was said all the previous successful candidates were included in the result.
However, 280 candidates from the ethnic minority who were included the first time alleged they were left out in the results published in the second time.
The High Court, moved by a petition, later ordered the commission to include those candidates in the results and the written tests
